Can a publisher be held responsible for publishing unscholarly work?

In 2000 I wrote to a mainstream publisher explaining why a translation of an ancient text that they had then had in print for 15 years was unscholarly and misleading. They ignored my advice, and reprinted the translation five years later unaltered. It has since been used by dozens of scholars in other fields as their source of information about this particular text. Could I have a case against them? I have incontrovertible supporting evidence for my criticisms.  Many thanks for your help!

4.50K viewspublishing law

Alasdair Taylor's Answer

I don’t see an obvious cause of action. This is the kind of dispute that should probably be settled by scholarly rather than legal means.

Ask a question

Question in one sentence
Select a topic that best fits your question.

Search questions


Using this legal Q&A, users can get guidance on business-related legal questions from our legal experts.

The guidance is not legal advice; no lawyer-client or similar relationship is created by the Q&A.

By using the Q&A, you agree to the limitations and exclusions of liability set out in our terms and conditions.

SEQ Legal
Copyright © 2024 Docular Limited | All rights reserved